Here are some examples.
(copied from www.dhost.hk)
(oppa gangnam style re- created by Ocean Park)
Copyright of derivative work in Hong Kong has been the talk of town in recent years.
Most of the people disagree there should be laws to restrict the re- creation of the
works from the internet. They say so because they believe the development of creative
ideas will be disturbed.
ideas will be disturbed.
On the other hand, the ones who support the laws believe it is their works. As such,
they have the right to stop people from using them. Moreover, many owners spend
lots of money and resources on their works. One of the examples is music video by
singers. If they don't stop the others to re-create the works, their benefits will be
reduced.
they have the right to stop people from using them. Moreover, many owners spend
lots of money and resources on their works. One of the examples is music video by
singers. If they don't stop the others to re-create the works, their benefits will be
reduced.
My opinion is that the law should not be set up. For the public, they can hardly
express their opinions on the internet by re- creating something new. For the
owners, it is hard for them to find out how many the contents have been copied. It
is very time- consuming.
I do believe re- creation is a golden opportunity for the public to express their
feelings and show their creation.
express their opinions on the internet by re- creating something new. For the
owners, it is hard for them to find out how many the contents have been copied. It
is very time- consuming.
I do believe re- creation is a golden opportunity for the public to express their
feelings and show their creation.
ya I think the law should not be set up neither because it would limit people's creativity. It is so difficult to really come up with something very original. We always build on someone's idea to create our own stuff. Like your ocean park gangnam style, even it is not very original, it still shows people's creativity to produce an ocean park version.
回覆刪除